Jump to content

    Clickbait Headlines Work For Now, But They're Going To Die

    I spent a full day editing the damn video so I hope you like it :-)



    -If you like it, please click the “Like” button

    -If you REALLY like it, please subscribe to my YouTube channel (or go to Kopy.tv)



    Starting about 2012 you may have noticed a sharp increase in “Click Bait” headlines.  Stuff like this:

    “You won’t believe what this old man does after…..”


    “My faith in humanity has been restored…..#6 is amazing!”


    The formula for these headlines is usually:

    [Curiosity] + [Don’t close the loop]


    It’s more trickery than actual delivering the goods.  And they’re exploiting a part of the human psyche called a “Closed Loop” where people expect to hear a complete thought…..not someone just trailing off.

    I made a video about these Clickbait Headlines that will teach you:

    • How clickbait headlines nab your attention so well.
    • Why they will eventually lose their effectiveness in the next 12-48 months.
    • What YOU can copy from these headlines without being scammy.
    • Why some organizations don’t mean to piss people off with them, but how it happens anyways.


    You see, if I said something like:

    “The crazy thing about an alligator is that they………..

    ::I leave the room::”

    This might get you curious about what the hell I was about to say.  Because I left that loop open in your brain….and your brain wants to close it.

    “The crazy thing about an alligator is that they……are reptiles not mammals.”

    Not as interesting once I “Closed The Loop” huh?

    Hell, even I’m sort of the problem!

    I teach copywriting techniques to get people to read your stuff.

    We have a plugin at AppSumo called KingSumo Headlines that uses a self-learning algorithm to constantly test different headlines.  So we’re part of the problem.

    But here’s the main problem which will invariably cause the decline of this kind of headline:


    The content rarely lives up to the headline.


    That single statement will eventually (in a few years) decimate this type of headline.

    Even one of my favorrriitee news sources (Digg.com) is guilty of this.  Not as egregiously guilty, but still.

    EXAMPLE: Checkout this box on Digg.  Quite the clickable headline (which I’ve seen three different variants of because they test these constantly):


    But here’s the actual article it points to…..which is highly disappointing:


    WTF!?!?  I clicked it, read it…and got NOTHING from it.

    It’s 1.5 pages of fluff.

    Also the “research” they refer to is highly dubious, misinterpreted, and was “supposedly” performed on just 30 volunteers on a college campus.

    This is NOT proper reporting, proper science, or even a good sample size.  Not only that, but the article didn’t even draw any strong conclusions.

    Overall my expectation was HIGH.

    The article delivered LOW.

    That gap is disappointment….or a “meh” feeling.

    Now, are these people greedy little weasels trying to exploit people…..well, not really.  See here’s how it happens in the real world.

    An article is written.  Let’s say it’s called “People who share too much on Facebook make me sick.”

    It’s just a silly rant written by the gossip editor.

    But then news sites around the globe hungry to post clickable content find this through their alerts.  “Ooohh, and article about Facebook AND relationships!!”

    • Clickability of Facebook stuff = High!
    • Clickability of Relationship stuff = High!
    • Both together = SUPER HIGH!

    So now it goes over to some clever copywriters whose SOLE job is to enter new titles for the content and re-post it.  Like this:

    • Title 1 (+297%): Should you post a lot about your relationship on Facebook?
    • Title 2 (-80%): Facebook relationships are crap.
    • Title 3 (+2%): Lol I knew my friends would breakup when they posted this to Facebook…..
    • Title 4 (+164%): 3 people you should NOT be on Facebook
    • Title 5 (+297%): What if your boyfriend posted this on Facebook?
    • Title 6 (-23%): Guide to Facebook relationships.
    • Title 7 (+186%): Everything you need to know about relationships on Facebook
    • Title 8 WINNER (+521%): The psychology of over sharing Facebook couples.

    (Upworthy tests a minimum of 25 headlines per article).

    So after entering this into a split-testing system (where the computer tries out each headline a few thousand times), the results come in that Title 8 has a 521% high click through rate!

    Now if you’re a website whose sole purpose is to sell advertising and therefore you need lots of clicks, THIS is the ultimate jackpot!

    Screw how good the article is.  You don’t particularly care so long as people are clicking.  RIIGGHTT?  Well, wrong.

    So now that the article is “optimized” for clicks, it goes on to be promoted to the homepage, and blasted out to email newsletters, and tweeted, and gets paid advertisements.  The whole system pushes the article forward.

    And yes, that link IS clickable.

    And yes there was tons of optimization done to the TITLE of the article, but the article itself got no more love and attention.

    Maybe if it answered some basic questions:

    • Who breaks up the most?
    • Which kind of couples stay together the longest?
    • Shows some data to actually back this up?
    • References Facebook’s many studies about this kind of thing?
    • Gives some tips on how NOT to act.

    But instead the article never got an upgrade.


    Expect something great, get something average.  You’ve now disappointed someone.   Now, even though that disappointment is not the worst thing in the world…..over time people get disillusioned with this stuff.

    Especially smarter people.  Eventually everyone starts doing it, and people get desensitized.

    OK OK OK OK…..enough complaining.  What can WE do about this??

    We all know headline testing works really damn well.  That’s why these sites use it so much.  And that’s never going away.

    Instead we can simply change this equation around:




    You see, this way you get:

    • High click through rates.
    • High satisfaction rates.
    • High trust.
    • High longevity.

    If you’re gonna do a sneaky “open loop” title, at least close the loop in the article!!

    If we all start doing this, we’ll make the internet a better place :-)









    P.S. Watch the video directly on YouTube here:


    P.P.S. If you want to learn more about writing a proper headline, check these articles out:
    1. Giant list of power and trigger words.
    2. Create a great tagline for your subject line.
    3. Copywriting courses and books to help you write copy.
    4. Copywriting headlines that sell.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    As always, you are delivering the goods yourself! Great stuff, and I agree that the baity headlines will rung the course. maybe a decent mixture of baity vs old school headlines is good. thanks Nev.
    Link to comment
    Thanks Bryan! Nothing wrong with hyping up the headline if the link you're pointing to is worth it
    Link to comment
    Totally agree on raising the value of the content. Got a question though, is there a way to measure and optimize it similar to how the headline is optimized? Headline split-testing is straightforward because the measurement is direct. More clicks -> Better headline. Measuring content satisfaction seems a lot less straightforward. Obviously there are some articles that can have direct measurement based on engagement, if there's a video, how many times the video was viewed all the way through, etc. But it seems that some items (like your 31 things to do in Austin) example are a lot less straightforward. Time on page isn't adequate as many people will just skim as you did, but others may actually go through and read each item. What suggestions do you have for being as objective and methodical in improving content as split testing is for headlines?
    Link to comment
    Guest Jon Symons


    Joe, I think Facebook shares and Twitter shares would be a pretty good measure of how successfully the article delivered. No one shares anything that disappoints them.
    Link to comment

    Well if the person comes away from an article knowing more than they previously did, that's a good thing.

    And like Jon said, the number of shares and comments can be a decent indicator too.

    This is usually a pretty obvious thing. If you call an article "THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO MAKING MONEY" and it's just a few links pointing to other crappy articles, it's probably a failure.

    Link to comment

    I recently subscribed to your blog and I'm loving these articles. I laughed when I saw the title of this one. I thought I was the only one who couldn't take these "bait" headlines anymore. I equate them to the psyche of a friend I had a while back who used to text me with ridiculous urgency, "OMG call me!!1!" So I'd call her and ask what happened. "Oh, nothing much ... what are you up to?"

    Anyway, same concept -- it works the first few times and then your audience figures you out.

    Link to comment
    Guest Give me head (lines) :: Kopywriting Kourse


    […] predictions for the slow (but certain) death of those annoying Click Bait Headlines is coming true sooner than […]
    Link to comment

    Bahahhaha......I've seen this, pretty funny.

    These headlines will always be around, but they will be penalized more and more.

    Link to comment

    Very true Kelly! Soon enough people get used to the disappointment and become less likely to click.

    These headlines will always be around, but better social ranking will weed them out eventually (like when enough people down-vote something it starts to disappear from the rankings).

    Link to comment
    Guest SEO Tactics To Become An Authority In Your Niche


    […] This video will explain why: Clickbait Headlines Work For Now, But They’re Going To Die […]
    Link to comment
    Guest Creating Isn’t Easy


    […] get people to click on your scammy ads, then writing mediocre content may cut it. (It’s a dying model, though). But writing good content – stuff that people will actually read and find useful […]
    Link to comment
    Guest I Created A Content Mill, Made 50 Shitty Articles, and Here’s The Results :: Kopywriting Kourse


    […] I write clickbait articles on recent celebrity divorces, that will surely get some clicks, but it won’t bring the right […]
    Link to comment

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

    • Join 55,000+ people getting our newsletter

      nev-and-logo-going-into-email (3).gif

      - Get notified of new posts -
      - Get weekly S.W.I.P.E.S. Email -
      - Get a free masterclass in copy -
      - People love our emails, see testimonials -

    • Create New...